[Latin Name] Glycine max (L.) Mere

[Plant Source] China

[Specifications] Isoflavones 20%, 40%, 60%

[Appearance] Brown yellow fine powder

[Plant Part Used] Soybean

[Particle size] 80 Mesh

[Loss on drying] ≤5.0%

[Heavy Metal] ≤10PPM

[Storage] Store in cool & dry area, keep away from the direct light and heat.

[Package] Packed in paper-drums and two plastic-bags inside.

[Active ingredients]

[What is Soy Isoflavones]

Non-genetically modified soybean refined soy isoflavones, a natural nutritional factors for a variety of important physiological activity is a natural plant estrogen, easily absorbed by the body.

Isoflavones are phytoestrogens planned economy a weak hormones, soy is the only valid source of human access to  isoflavones. In the case of strong estrogen physiological activity, isoflavones can play the role of anti-estrogen. Isoflavones very prominent anti-cancer properties, can hinder the growth and spread of cancer cells and only cancer, isoflavones had no impact on normal cells. Isoflavones has an effective of anti-oxidant.

[Functions]

1. Lower Cancer Risk In Men and Women;

2. Use In Estrogen Replacement Therapy;

3. Lower Cholesterol and Reduce Heart Disease Risk;

4. Relieve women menopause syndrome, guard against osteoporosis;

5. Protect human body from destroy by free-radical to advance immunity;

6. Be healthy for stomach and spleen and protect nerve system;

7. Reduce cholesterin thickness in human body, prevent and cure cardiovascular disease;

8. Prevent cancer and counteract cancer£¬for example, prostate cancer, breast cancer.

[Application] Used in Lower cancer risk, estrogen replacement therapy, advance immunity, prevent and cure cardiovascular disease.

Vigorelle is the best female enhancement cream on the market today to improve libido and restore lack of sex drive, increa… https://clikhere.co/d7l9KMyn

In 2009 the US FDA approved two versions of a new sweetener developed for Coca-Cola and Pepsi, Truvia and PureVia, both of which use rebiana—an extract from the South American plant Stevia. Truvia has just hit the market in Great Britain supported by gigantic public relations celebrations that would do an aspiring politician proud. Stevia, in its natural state, is the best no-calorie health-supporting natural sweetener on the planet. Here is what you should know:

1. Truvia is NOT Stevia.
2. I advise that you avoid it.

Like every plant which has long been used as a food source, Stevia is a complex of synergistic substances and compounds including numerous steviosides, rebaudiosides, and glycosides. It is this synergistic power that creates its unique benefits including its anti-oxidant properties. When the FDA declared that these two manufactured zero-calorie sweeteners were “generally recognized as safe” (GRAS) it referred only to a couple of the active ingredients taken from Stevia that had been used in manufacturing including rebaudioside A—a component which imparts to the natural Stevia plant some of its sweet taste.

What takes place when you extract only one or two of a plant’s parts and throw away the rest? Does the product you make out of this affect your body the same way as the natural plant? Virtually never. In The Toxicology of Rebaudioside A: A Review, researchers at UCLA report that a living organism metabolizes stevioside compounds and rebaudioside A at different rates. This makes it impossible to assess the potential risks to the body.
Click Here to view the Toxicology of Rebaudioside from the University of California

The company behind the development of both Truvia and PureVia is Cargill. Cargill is one of the most notorious corporate polluters in America (which Conde Nast Portfolio listed as one of the “Toxic Ten.”) Coke and Cargill have conducted their own ‘research’ into the safety of Truvia on which the FDA gave them the go ahead to sell the sweetener. However, no genuinely independent studies have been done to affirm the safety of the product.

And as even the Truvia website itself states: “While rebiana is natural and comes from a plant, it is not certified or grown organically at this time. That could happen in the future, depending on consumer demand.” How absurd. How can you claim to have invented an “all-natural” zero-cal sweetener that is not only not organically grown but which no genuinely independent studies have shown to be safe to use over time?